There is nothing scarier than a woman in politics



It is difficult to argue that women are the least competent gender when they have spent the last ten million years outsourcing mankind’s physical labor to men in return for sexual favors.

This beneficial arrangement backfires women from time to time, but in general, it is an effective strategy for dealing with physical gender imbalance. The question “which is the most powerful sex?” »Remains impossible to answer, women frequently holding the reins of power by the balls.

The manipulation of men is so complete that, for most of modern history, a man unknown to a woman in distress will always protect her in order to honor the social norms of the time. Less generous feminists will claim that men only help women in the hope of having sex with them, but it seems that men enjoy the gentleman’s story and derive satisfaction only from the act of rescuing.

Women play much less angelic games with men.

Competition for a position in society through sexual intercourse dominates the female experience. Whether intentional or not, female friendships can be defined by their lover preference. The strongest relationships between women are often based on competing interests in men, ensuring that women do not pose a threat to each other’s ambitions. This is pheromonal, not deliberate.

Men are not the tough guy in this scenario.

Not only do they have women competing for their attention, but successful women spend their considerable talents to protect the man and his position from everyone, regardless of gender. The protection of a dominant woman has secured many political empires throughout history, while the maintenance of power is often left to the intrigues of wives, mistresses, mothers and daughters.

In politics, women hold the power that men hold publicly.

It is not necessary for the Australian government or individual political parties to impose gender quotas in Parliament. Women are particularly suited to the complexities of politics. The problem is not a question of merit or desire, but rather of “style”. History shows us that women prefer secret politics. They build networks of intrigue that extend so deep into political and social regimes that men only become aware of the sons after they have been captured by a successful plot.

As the men trade verbal blows and spend years fighting for an inch of land, a sidelong glance from an attractive woman can void a treaty between nations.

Men parade power – carry it on their chests, hoist it on flags, demand that it be shouted on the battlefields, and crowd the halls of Parliament. Attracting women to this arena must be a natural process, not a forced system of militant revenge. The more women who are artificially pushed into inappropriate political positions and then fail, the less likely the appropriate women are to take their chances. Models cannot be made, they have to create themselves without reference to the feminist agenda.

On the contrary, modern feminism has started to erode the power of women. Angry social movements have told women to make themselves unattractive as a symbol of “power” – to let go of the shackles of beauty and femininity in order to conquer the male world. The harsh biological reality is that there is nothing less powerful than an unattractive woman of average ability. They occupy the same position in society as a weak man without the virtue of a bank balance.

Very few women who lack the gifts of nature manage to dominate men. The successful few possess greater cruelty than their male counterparts – something that cannot and should not be replicated by the masses. These women, who are the exception to the rule, do not need the help of feminism. They have ruled through the centuries by the sheer force of their iron will – and continue to do so.

The demands of modern feminism betray the fragility of its parasitic movement. The very last thing these activists want is a powerful, attractive and accomplice woman, dressed in a short skirt and high heels, strolling on the political scene. Such a woman is out of their control and will certainly cut down on the fragile #metoo demands of incompetent quota holders who survive on career aids from party strategists.

If modern women are exposed to this scenario, the days of ugly feminist activism and screaming are numbered. Women want to be beautiful. They want to be powerful. Once they realize that they can also be publicly political – who knows …

Alexandra Marshall is a freelance writer. If you would like to support his work, yell him coffee at the donor box.

Do you have something to add ? Join the discussion and comment below.



Comments are closed.